Within my collection, I have found a very interesting letter which adds to the story told by Roger Harris in his article in Volume 43 No.1. Page 1 of the letter is shown below as Figure 1.
You will see from the top of the letter, it is addressed from the Post Office, Alderney and is dated 5 February 46. This date is in fact incorrect and should read 5 March. The writer, John, in the very first sentence is talking in the past tense about the vacancy advertised on 20 February (i.e. 15 days after 5 February) and he is very annoyed that Marriette did not arrive on 1 March as he expected, which prompted him to send the letter which I think he wrote on 5 March. This ties in very nicely with the cancellation on the envelope (Figure 3) of 6 March. Col. Marriette was the Sub-Postmaster at Alderney prior to the Occupation and, in the event, did not resume his posting until 1 October 1946. This suggests that John had been holding the fort at the Alderney Post Office pending Marriette’s return.
According to the Guernsey Almanac of 1940, the addressee, H.M. Lihou, was an “Overseer” at the Guernsey Post Office, and in 1947 he is recorded as the Assistant Postmaster. It is clear, therefore, that Mr Lihou was sufficiently influential for John to have written to him personally with his concerns although the letter is somewhat lacking in respect in certain areas. I would have expected, for instance, that John would have given Marriette his title especially as John is subordinate to him. The letter is also addressed to Mr. Lihou at his private address at Foulon Farm and has not been sent to the Head Post Office in Guernsey in an OHMS(1) envelope or with OHMS written on it. It is therefore sent to Mr Lihou as a civilian, otherwise he would not have needed to put stamps on the envelope.
I think Lihou is someone that John knew very well, is probably older than him and for whom he may have worked from a young age, possibly on the farm. Hence the respect he has given him by calling him Mr Lihou but also the familiarity that a much younger person would have by signing the letter with his Christian name rather than surname, as would be the norm.
Lihou seems to run some sort of “Club” that John has been involved in. He is very concerned about leaving Lihou “in the lurch as regards the club for I realise how difficult things are at the moment” if he takes the telegraphists vacancy for six months. He wants to know if Lihou can spare him “for the rest of the club year” even though he “does owe a duty to the club” and he hasn’t been much assistance to Lihou since last October. I have not been able to establish the nature of this “Club” and if any member is able to provide me with this information, it would be much appreciated.
Having established that Lihou was heavily involved at the Head Post Office in Guernsey, this is further amplified because John says he is probably aware of the temporary vacancies “posted in the P.O.C. of 20th Feb”. I think P.O.C. is a Post Office Circular. They both knew Marriette and John does not feel the need to give him his title. John is also asking Lihou if he has any knowledge of the change-over date.
John also seems to be relatively educated but, in my view, the letter is a very young person’s letter. This is especially evident in the last paragraph (Figure 2) when he refers to “this joint” and “Cheerio for now”.
It is the last paragraph that is all important. “I was under the impression that Marriette was to take over this joint on March 1st. That is what he told me had been arranged. Now, however, he says that he has heard nothing about it. Perhaps you can enlighten me as to the date of the change-over, as I won’t be sorry to finish. Two months at a time is enough here at the moment. Cheerio for now.”
My thanks to Roger Harris for helping me to put this article together. I think that this is a fascinating letter and an interesting piece of social history.
It is also probably one of the few commercial items out of Alderney before October 1946.
(1) OHMS = On Her Majesty’s Service (official government mail)